Although there is no absolute proof of the parentage of James and Jonathan Pryor, there is an abundance of documentation of their connection to Richard and Mourning indicating that they were members of that family. Both James and Jonathan state that they were born in Tennessee on the 1850 census. Richard and Mourning Pryor are known to have been residents of Tennessee before December 1787 when Mourning was recorded as one of the charter members of the Big Pigeon Primitive Baptist Church in Cocke County. When James Pryor died in Graves County in 1856, Richard Pryor was listed as his father on his death record although the name of his mother appears to be something closer to Miriam. By the time Jonathan died around 1862, Graves County had suspended the practice of filing death reports so there is no similar record for him. In Graves County where both Jonathan and James lived the rest of their lives and raised their families, it is generally accepted that they were brothers and local histories identify them as such.
On the 19th of June 1800, Mourning Pryor married Thomas White in Logan County, Kentucky and the following Smith County, Tennessee deed confirms that she was Richard Pryor's widow:
10 May 1802 - Smith Co., TN Deed Book 1801-17 p. 94Five years after Mourning married Thomas White, on September 28, 1805, Jonathan Pryor married his youngest daughter Elizabeth. When Thomas died in 1806, he named Mourning as the executrix of his estate in his will dated 18 Mar 1805. She is recorded, as Mourning White, in Logan County tax records after Thomas’ death and in the 1810 census. Presumably she died sometime before 1820. Trips to Logan County to search extensively for more information have failed to produce any further record of Mourning or a gravesite.
Between Thomas White and Mourning White, formerly Prior (Pryor) admx. of Richard Pryor, decd of Logan Co., KY and James Ewing of Smith Co., TN...During the lifetime of said Richard Pryor, he bound himself in the penal sum of 200 pounds to execute a deed to William Pryor for 400 acres of land, his choice of 1280 acres part of 3000 acres lying on the Caneyford of Cumberland River, Mourning White (formerly Pryor) widow of Richard obtained letters of Administration of said decedent and said William Pryor has sold to James Ewing his rights to 200 of the 400 acres of land etc.
Jonathan and James Pryor with their young families left Logan County around 1820 moving further west into the newly opened Jackson Purchase. They reportedly first settled in Callaway County for a short time but by the 1830 census they were located in Graves County. Jonathan’s daughter Eustacia's marriage to Burrell Williams on April 15, 1824 is said to be the first marriage recorded in Graves County. The first grants west of the Tennessee River to Jonathan and James Pryor are both dated July 7, 1825. Over the next 10 years, there are additional grants totaling more than 3,000 acres to each of them.
Sometimes what you have is all you will get. It sounds like a very strong argument in favor of them being brothers. If you have Never come across anything that puts it into question; no other persons by that name that could fit in or put a crack in the argument; then the theory has a pretty strong base to stand on.
ReplyDeleteJust my thoughts!
Regards,
Theresa (Tangled Trees)
I forgot to add: There is always Y dna testing. But you need a Male descendant from both men to definitively prove them as brothers. :-)
ReplyDeleteI just saw found your website through Geneabloggers. Welcome to Geneabloggers.
ReplyDeleteRegards, Jim
Genealogy Blog at Hidden Genealogy Nuggets
I am a descendant of Mourning Thomson & Richard Pryor. I wondered if there was a DNA Surname group for either surname? I just got my mtDNA results back from FTDNA and have uploaded my info to GEDMATCH as well. Cindy Faulkner, Floresville TX
ReplyDeleteCindy, Thanks for commenting. As far as I know the only DNA participants in either the Pryor or Thomson/Thompson DNA Project at FtDNA are those male Pryor descendants who did the Y-DNA test. I'm a Co-Admin of the Reeves DNA Project and we also have members who have done the Family Finder and mtDNA tests but apparently that isn't the case with all projects.
ReplyDeleteHave you logged into your FtDNA account to see if you have the option to joint these projects? I just looked at the available surname projects and both Thompson and Pryor appear to be for male participants only.
There should be a list of your matches in your mtDNA results on your profile page in FtDNA. I assume you didn't do the Family Finder because I looked and couldn't find you in my matches. My Pryor lineage isn't strictly through my maternal line.
Beverly